Comments on: Jeene update: Performance, features and backlog http://blog.higher-order.net/2008/09/21/jeene-update-performance-features-and-backlog/ topics: functional programming, concurrency, web-development, REST, dynamic languages Sun, 04 Jul 2010 07:43:34 -0700 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: admin http://blog.higher-order.net/2008/09/21/jeene-update-performance-features-and-backlog/comment-page-1/#comment-1362 admin Thu, 09 Apr 2009 16:34:18 +0000 http://blog.higher-order.net/?p=139#comment-1362 It is a long time since I wrote that comment ;-) But I believe that I meant the (1 + (2 + "foo")) != ((1 + 2) + "foo") example. I haven't been working on Jeene for a while, since a couple of people got me down about using toString/toSource on functions and then re-parsing them. Good to hear from you. Let me know if you are more interested in Jeene. - Karl It is a long time since I wrote that comment ;-) But I believe that I meant the

(1 + (2 + “foo”)) != ((1 + 2) + “foo”)

example.

I haven’t been working on Jeene for a while, since a couple of people got me down about using toString/toSource on functions and then re-parsing them.

Good to hear from you. Let me know if you are more interested in Jeene.

- Karl

]]> By: artyom http://blog.higher-order.net/2008/09/21/jeene-update-performance-features-and-backlog/comment-page-1/#comment-1361 artyom Thu, 09 Apr 2009 07:52:32 +0000 http://blog.higher-order.net/?p=139#comment-1361 Hi, First off, great job! I'm writing a little soon-to-be-released reactive animation library based on Flapjax (flapjax-lang.org). Incidentally, functions that need specializing are pure and referentially transparent, but they do have local variables (constants, really) and ternary ifs... > to be associative, which is not sound in general but is for common case uses (ask me for details) Can you elaborate on this point? Do you mean that (1 + (2 + "foo")) and ((1 + 2) + "foo") give different results? Anything else? (problems with floating-point precision, perhaps?) Thanks for your work! Hi,

First off, great job!

I’m writing a little soon-to-be-released reactive animation library based on Flapjax (flapjax-lang.org).

Incidentally, functions that need specializing are pure and referentially transparent, but they do have local variables (constants, really) and ternary ifs…

> to be associative, which is not sound in general but is for common case uses (ask me for details)

Can you elaborate on this point?

Do you mean that (1 + (2 + “foo”)) and ((1 + 2) + “foo”) give different results? Anything else? (problems with floating-point precision, perhaps?)

Thanks for your work!

]]>