<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The need for Clojure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.higher-order.net/2008/10/18/the-need-for-clojure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.higher-order.net/2008/10/18/the-need-for-clojure/</link>
	<description>topics: functional programming, concurrency, web-development, REST, dynamic languages</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 07:43:34 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://blog.higher-order.net/2008/10/18/the-need-for-clojure/comment-page-1/#comment-1135</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 17:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.higher-order.net/?p=156#comment-1135</guid>
		<description>@happy_developer,

Yes, Clojure operates extremely well with Java. There are many more details at http://clojure.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@happy_developer,</p>
<p>Yes, Clojure operates extremely well with Java. There are many more details at <a href="http://clojure.org" rel="nofollow">http://clojure.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricky Clarkson</title>
		<link>http://blog.higher-order.net/2008/10/18/the-need-for-clojure/comment-page-1/#comment-1131</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricky Clarkson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 14:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.higher-order.net/?p=156#comment-1131</guid>
		<description>Abcom:

1. Actually, CLOS (Common Lisp&#039;s Object System) is much closer to Alan Kay&#039;s original definition of OO than any of C++, Java and C# are.  It&#039;s sad that &#039;mainstream OO&#039; means &#039;looks like C++&#039;.

Also, OO is the problem, it is something to move away from.

2. In my experience, non-programmers can learn lisp in minutes.  Are you saying that C/C++/Java/C# programmers are actually disabled in some way?

Incidentally, C# is probably a better language than you think; many of its competent programmers would probably enjoy lisp, apart from the lack of a type system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abcom:</p>
<p>1. Actually, CLOS (Common Lisp&#8217;s Object System) is much closer to Alan Kay&#8217;s original definition of OO than any of C++, Java and C# are.  It&#8217;s sad that &#8216;mainstream OO&#8217; means &#8216;looks like C++&#8217;.</p>
<p>Also, OO is the problem, it is something to move away from.</p>
<p>2. In my experience, non-programmers can learn lisp in minutes.  Are you saying that C/C++/Java/C# programmers are actually disabled in some way?</p>
<p>Incidentally, C# is probably a better language than you think; many of its competent programmers would probably enjoy lisp, apart from the lack of a type system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: happy_developer</title>
		<link>http://blog.higher-order.net/2008/10/18/the-need-for-clojure/comment-page-1/#comment-1130</link>
		<dc:creator>happy_developer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 14:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.higher-order.net/?p=156#comment-1130</guid>
		<description>Hi, do you know whether Clojure can be used in Java application?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, do you know whether Clojure can be used in Java application?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abcom</title>
		<link>http://blog.higher-order.net/2008/10/18/the-need-for-clojure/comment-page-1/#comment-1126</link>
		<dc:creator>Abcom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 10:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.higher-order.net/?p=156#comment-1126</guid>
		<description>4. LISP isn&#039;t an OO-language(any other mainstream language is)
5. It would be hard for C/C++/Java/C# progs to learn it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4. LISP isn&#8217;t an OO-language(any other mainstream language is)<br />
5. It would be hard for C/C++/Java/C# progs to learn it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricky Clarkson</title>
		<link>http://blog.higher-order.net/2008/10/18/the-need-for-clojure/comment-page-1/#comment-1124</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricky Clarkson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 09:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.higher-order.net/?p=156#comment-1124</guid>
		<description>Lisp is certainly great, and Clojure looks like a reasonable lisp.  I wonder why the JVM attracts untyped languages while .NET attracts typed ones.  Could it be that the Java language has damaged people&#039;s ideas of what types are for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lisp is certainly great, and Clojure looks like a reasonable lisp.  I wonder why the JVM attracts untyped languages while .NET attracts typed ones.  Could it be that the Java language has damaged people&#8217;s ideas of what types are for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Higher-Order &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Annotated Clojure links - part 1</title>
		<link>http://blog.higher-order.net/2008/10/18/the-need-for-clojure/comment-page-1/#comment-521</link>
		<dc:creator>Higher-Order &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Annotated Clojure links - part 1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.higher-order.net/?p=156#comment-521</guid>
		<description>[...] (and the web in particular), and that most people aren&#8217;t taking this seriously enough. In my last posting I claimed that  I will write a number of blog postings about my experiences with Clojure. [...] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (and the web in particular), and that most people aren&#8217;t taking this seriously enough. In my last posting I claimed that  I will write a number of blog postings about my experiences with Clojure. [...] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
